The U.S. trucking industry is a cornerstone of the nation’s freight transportation network, responsible for moving goods across the country. In 2017, the Trump administration issued executive orders designed to reduce government regulations across various sectors, including trucking. As part of this effort, the Department of Transportation (DOT) sought input from stakeholders on which regulations were burdensome or costly. Among the 900 recommendations submitted to the DOT, approximately 30% came from the trucking sector. These responses reflected widespread concern over regulations that were seen as outdated, inefficient, or excessively costly. This blog post delves into the trucking sector’s push for deregulation, focusing on the key areas that generated the most debate.
One of the most contentious issues raised in the trucking sector’s response to the DOT was the mandate for electronic logging devices (ELDs). The ELD mandate was introduced to enhance safety by tracking truckers’ driving hours, ensuring they comply with federal hours-of-service (HOS) rules. While many industry stakeholders, such as the American Trucking Associations (ATA), argue that ELDs have improved road safety and driver accountability, there is significant opposition from some truckers and independent operators.
Critics of the ELD mandate argue that these devices are expensive and inflexible. Smaller operators, in particular, feel the financial burden of purchasing and maintaining the devices. Additionally, many truckers have voiced concerns about the devices’ impact on their driving habits, with some suggesting that the pressure to adhere strictly to the clock has led to unsafe driving practices, including speeding or driving longer hours than is safe. Proponents of the mandate, however, counter that ELDs provide more accurate data and reduce the chances of falsifying logs, thus enhancing safety.
In response to the ELD mandate, some stakeholders have called for the requirement to be relaxed. Suggestions include making ELDs optional for drivers with good safety records or exempting certain drivers from the mandate entirely. These proposals are part of broader requests for more flexibility in how hours-of-service rules are applied, which could result in safer and more efficient driving practices for truckers.
The hours-of-service regulations are another area of contention in the trucking industry’s push for deregulation. These rules govern the number of hours a driver can spend behind the wheel and the required rest periods to ensure safety on the road. While these regulations are designed to prevent driver fatigue, many drivers feel they are too restrictive and limit their earning potential.
Several truckers and industry associations, including the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), have called for changes to the current HOS rules. These changes include reducing the mandatory 10-hour reset period to eight hours, which would allow drivers to get back on the road more quickly. Additionally, there is a push to modify or eliminate the 70-hour rule, which restricts the total number of hours a driver can work in a given week. Other suggestions include providing more flexibility in how drivers split their rest periods and reconsidering the 30-minute break requirement that currently mandates a break after eight consecutive hours of driving.
The trucking industry’s concerns over the rigidity of HOS rules highlight the ongoing debate between safety and operational flexibility. While safety is paramount, finding a balance between adequate rest for drivers and allowing them more flexibility in managing their work hours could benefit both operators and the industry at large.
Another key issue raised in the trucking sector’s response to the DOT was the lack of transparency in broker-carrier relationships. Truckers and independent operators have expressed frustration over the opacity of transactions between freight brokers and carriers. These relationships are often seen as one-sided, with truckers receiving little insight into the fees brokers charge to shippers or how those fees are distributed along the supply chain.
Some commenters in the trucking sector have called for greater transparency, with suggestions including regulatory caps on broker fees or mandatory disclosure of amounts brokers charge shippers. The idea behind these proposals is to ensure that carriers are paid fairly for their services and to level the playing field in an industry that often sees small operators pitted against larger, more powerful players. However, the ATA and the Transportation Intermediaries Association have pushed back on these suggestions, arguing that such regulations could reduce competition in the freight market and expose trade secrets that benefit both brokers and shippers.
While the push for transparency aims to ensure fairer compensation for truckers, it also raises concerns about the potential consequences for market competition. The trucking industry’s position on this issue reflects the complex dynamics of the freight market, where the interests of brokers, carriers, and shippers must be carefully balanced.
Emissions regulations and the requirements for diesel exhaust fluid (DEF) systems have also been a source of frustration for many in the trucking sector. These regulations, intended to reduce the environmental impact of diesel-powered trucks, have led to increased costs and reliability concerns for operators.
Truckers have voiced concerns that the cost of maintaining DEF systems has significantly increased the total cost of owning and operating a truck. Additionally, there are concerns about the reduced reliability of these systems, with some truckers reporting frequent breakdowns and malfunctions. From an environmental standpoint, however, these systems are intended to meet stringent air quality standards, particularly in urban areas where pollution is a pressing concern.
Despite the financial and operational challenges posed by DEF systems, some in the industry argue that the environmental benefits are worth the investment. These systems help reduce harmful emissions, contributing to cleaner air and a reduction in the overall environmental footprint of the trucking industry. However, truckers are divided on whether the benefits outweigh the costs, leading to continued debates over the future of emissions regulations in the sector.
The trucking sector’s responses to the DOT’s request for comments on deregulation reveal a range of concerns and demands for change. From calls to modify the ELD mandate and adjust hours-of-service rules to requests for greater transparency in broker-carrier relationships and frustration with emissions regulations, the trucking industry is seeking a more flexible and fair regulatory environment. While these issues are complex and multifaceted, it is clear that the trucking sector wants to ensure that regulations serve the best interests of operators and drivers while maintaining safety and efficiency on the road.
When it comes to shipping vehicles, Ship A Car, Inc. is the number one choice for customers looking for reliable and efficient services. With over a decade of experience in the industry, Ship A Car specializes in shipping a wide range of vehicles, from motorcycles to golf carts, cars, and trucks. Their expert coordinators are available to help you get the best possible shipping price and provide tailored services for your needs. Call (866) 821-4555 today to speak with a knowledgeable transport coordinator and get started on your vehicle shipping journey.
1. What is the ELD mandate, and why is it controversial?
The ELD mandate requires truckers to use electronic devices to log their driving hours. Critics argue that ELDs are costly, inflexible, and can lead to unsafe driving, while supporters claim they improve safety and reduce the risk of falsified records.
2. How do changes to hours-of-service rules affect truck drivers?
Changes to hours-of-service rules, such as reducing mandatory rest periods and providing more flexibility, would allow truckers to manage their driving hours better, potentially improving efficiency without compromising safety.
3. Why is transparency important in broker-carrier relationships?
Transparency ensures that truckers are paid fairly for their work and that the supply chain remains competitive. Calls for regulating broker fees and disclosing charges aim to create a fairer market for small operators.
